USPTO serial 74618782
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BADEN, CH
CH-5400 Baden, CH
CH-5400 Baden, CH
CH-5400 Baden, CH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam J. Cermak
Adam J. Cermak; Tomoko Nakajima Cermak Nakajima LLP127 S. Peyton Street, Suite 210Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical and electronic apparatus, namely, current switches; speed controllers; load controllers; current regulators; speed regulators; temperature regulators; current meters; speed meters; temperature meters; current monitors; voltage monitors; temperature monitors; load monitors; speed monitors; analog speed sensors; analog temperature sensors; digital drive sensors; digital drive switches; signal transmitters; signal processors; process computers and microprocessors; computer hardware interfaces; and computer monitors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 19, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 3, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |