USPTO serial 74619014
IMPOTENCE RESOURCE CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COOPER, VANESSA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMPOTENCE RESOURCE CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. Moose
RICHARD M MOOSE DORITY & MANNING, PASTE 15700 E N STGREENVILLE, SC 29601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | educational audiocassettes, videocassettes, and photographic slide transparencies, dealing with the subject of human male erectile dysfunction | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | educational brochures, booklets, and newsletters featuring information on human male erectile dysfunction, including male treatment guides, medical management information, and information from the women's perspective for partners of impotent men accompanying audiovisual materials, namely, educational audio cassettes, video cassettes, and photographic slide transparencies sold as a unit | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | educational services for advancing public and professional understanding of sensitive medical disorders, on human male erectile dysfunction, namely, publication of pamphlets, audiovisual materials, audio materials and photographic materials on the subject of human male erectile dysfunction; sponsoring, developing and carrying out seminar programs, namely, arranging for seminars to be presented by others on the subject of human male erectile dysfunction; sponsoring, developing, publishing and carrying out media appearances and written articles such as appearing in newspapers, newsletters and pamphlets by others on the subject of human male erectile dysfunction | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | sponsoring, developing and carrying telephone hot line counseling programs to educate toll-free callers to issues and facts in the subject area of human male erectile dysfunction; providing start-up services to support group start-ups, namely, providing information and facts on the subject of human male erectile dysfunction from both male and female perspectives to others who are operating of who plan to operate support groups | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GEDDINGS D. OSBON, SR. FOUNDATION, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IMPOTENCE RESOURCE CENTER
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |