USPTO serial 74619480
HUMBOLDT VISITOR HUMBOLDT COUNTY'S ANNUAL VISITOR & TOURISM GUIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUMBOLDT VISITOR HUMBOLDT COUNTY'S ANNUAL VISITOR & TOURISM GUIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARIAN H BIRGE
275 HILLCREST DR 104ENCINITAS, CA 92024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | layout of a magazine cover showing the word Visitor in Goudy typeface, with the letters V and R written in the word Visitor in a larger type than the remaining letters, two parallel lines above the word Visitor and between the larger V and R, and two parallel lines below the word Visitor; this entire word and design is enclosed in a rectangle at the top of the page; additionally, the layout features a border on the left side of the page, approximately 1/6th of the way across the page, and there is a rectangular box protruding from the top of the cover, but within the border, with the word "FREE" printed in the rectangle; the design also features four windows at the bottom of the page, with the third window containing descriptive text; the remaining three windows contain photographs | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |