USPTO serial 74619905
ALPINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALPINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS W BROOKE
THOMAS W BROOKE GADSBY & HANNAH LP1747 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 6, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |