USPTO serial 74619934
DN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm D. St. Landau
Norm D. St. Landau DRINKER, BIDDLE & REATH L.L.P.1500 K Street, N.W.SUITE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |