USPTO serial 74619936
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CAROL L B MATTHEWS
CAROL L B MATTHEWS GADSBY & HANNAH LLP1747 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | installation, maintenance and repair services for computer and data transmission systems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 6, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |