USPTO serial 74620045
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Medford, NY
Medford, NY
WEST MIDLANDS DY9 7AJ, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Kruse
PAUL W KRUSE CUSHMAN DARBY & CUSHMAN LLPNINTH FL E TWR1100 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3918| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | drawing instruments, namely sandpaper pads for sharpening drawing pencils, eraser dusting brushes, erasers, board clips, lead pointers, shields, triangles, protractors, compasses, rulers, lettering and numbering guides, mechanical and electric pencil sharpeners, stamp racks, chalkboards; chalkboard supplies, namely eraser, chalk and pins; and writing instruments, namely pens and pencils | ABANDONED | Dec 1, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |