USPTO serial 74620378
PUREGOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PUREGOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Lebanon, NH
West Lebanon, NH
West Lebanon, NH
West Lebanon, NH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Merritt, Bruce E
- Other trademarks owned by Merritt, Bruce E
- Other trademarks owned by Merritt, Gloria King
- Other trademarks owned by Merritt, Gloria King
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PUREGOLD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |