Drawing for CHICAGO COLTS

USPTO serial 74620618

CHICAGO COLTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CHICAGO COLTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leland P. Schermer

Leland P. Schermer Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C.Two PPG Place, Suite 400Pittsburgh, PA 15222-5402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts, jerseys, hats/caps, sport shirts, and jacketsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 17, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 29, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 29, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 29, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 29, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 18, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 11, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 16, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 22, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 20, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 19, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 18, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 17, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 15, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance