USPTO serial 74620721
WEST COAST HOCKEY LEAGUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LYKOS, ANGELA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEST COAST HOCKEY LEAGUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Emerich
DAVID EMERICH EMERICH, PEDREIRA & FIKE5220 N PALM AVEFRESNO, CA 93704UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | organizing, managing, and governing a hockey league; promoting the interests of members of the league; promoting the sport of hockey | ABANDONED | Jan 30, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |