USPTO serial 74621452
CREDITORS BANKRUPTCY SERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 21, 2000
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CREDITORS BANKRUPTCY SERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Hervey
Scott Hervey Weintraub Genshlea Chediak400 Capitol Mall11th FloorSACRAMENTO, CA 95814Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | bankruptcy-related services, namely case analysis, monitoring and reporting on bankrupt parties' activities, filing claims and payment processing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 17, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |