USPTO serial 74621460
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen M. Riggio
KAREN M RIGGIO645 FIFTH AVE - STE 700NEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed instructional, educational, teaching materials and publications, namely brochures, newsletters, workshop, course, training, and seminar handouts and materials, flyers, books, manuals, pamphlets, posters, business and accounting forms, printed survey answer sheets for improving credit knowledge, credit analysis, lending, obtaining financing, interpersonal effectiveness skills for financial personnel, improving knowledge of inflation accounting, investing aboard, political, economic, regulatory, legal, and accounting systems of the U.S. and foreign countries, cultural context of business practices, accounting, banking and financial language and terminology, and cross border differences in banking, accounting, financial and related business practices for international and U.S. based companies | ABANDONED | Jul 2, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |