USPTO serial 74621492
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C RONALD RICHES
C RONALD RICHES COASTAL TRADEMARK SERVICESP O BOX 12109 STE 2200555 W HASTINGS STVANCOUVER, BC V6B 4N6| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | power operated hole saws for use in the field of construction; blades for use with power operated saws, namely, saber saws blades and jig saw blades for use in the field of construction | ABANDONED | — |
| 008 | manually operated saws and blades therefor, namely, saw blades and hand saws for use in the field of construction | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |