Drawing for C.M.J. CALIFORNIA MOTOR JACKET

USPTO serial 74621510

C.M.J. CALIFORNIA MOTOR JACKET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with C.M.J. CALIFORNIA MOTOR JACKET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT DUBNO

HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVEP O BOX 900NEW YORK, NY 10471-0900

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing articles, namely wind-resistant jackets, neckerchiefs, jackets, trousers, waistcoats, jeans, vests, gloves, socks, tank tops, blousons, T-shirts, stockings, bandannas, head bands, pants, belts, scarves, skirts, head wear, footwearABANDONEDOct 10, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 28, 1998EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 22, 1998EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 19, 1997CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 25, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 28, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 6, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 5, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance