USPTO serial 74621510
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT DUBNO
HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVEP O BOX 900NEW YORK, NY 10471-0900| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing articles, namely wind-resistant jackets, neckerchiefs, jackets, trousers, waistcoats, jeans, vests, gloves, socks, tank tops, blousons, T-shirts, stockings, bandannas, head bands, pants, belts, scarves, skirts, head wear, footwear | ABANDONED | Oct 10, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 19, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |