USPTO serial 74622053
OASIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OASIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
bERNHARD KRETEN
77 CADILLAC DR STE 245SACRAMENTO, CA 95825UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer programming services specifically tailored for use by casino operators in a gaming environment | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |