USPTO serial 74622126
FRESH BREATH CENTRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRESH BREATH CENTRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Northridge, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
THOMAS I ROZSA ROZSA & CHEN15910 VENTURA BLVD STE 1601ENCINO, CA 91436-2185UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | promotional video tapes describing the benefits of the treatment of malodor | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 1994 |
| 010 | product kit for home and professional use to treat malodor consisting of toothpaste, mouth rinse, dental floss, breath fresheners, tongue scraper, toothbrush, and mechanical dental irrigating device | ACTIVE | May 31, 1994 |
| 016 | printed teaching manual describing the treatment of malodor | ACTIVE | Feb 18, 1994 |
| 042 | personal care services, namely malador prevention and treatment centres | ACTIVE | Apr 7, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OBC SYSTEMS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FRESH BREATH CENTRE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |