USPTO serial 74622226
PHANTOM PAYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHANTOM PAYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ARISTOCRAT LEISURE INDUSTRIES PTY LTD
Rosebery, New South Wales, 2018, AU
Other trademarks owned by ARISTOCRAT LEISURE INDUSTRIES PTY LTD
ARISTOCRAT LEISURE INDUSTRIES PTY LTD
Rosebery, New South Wales, 2018, AU
Other trademarks owned by ARISTOCRAT LEISURE INDUSTRIES PTY LTD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lauren Krupka
Lauren Krupka Aristocrat Technologies, Inc7230 Amigo StreetLegal DeptLas Vegas, NV 89119Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | gaming equipment, namely, poker machines and parts therefor | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 12, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 1996 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |