Drawing for MADE IN U.S.A. AOT AMERICAN ORTHOPEDIC TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 74622240

MADE IN U.S.A. AOT AMERICAN ORTHOPEDIC TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MADE IN U.S.A. AOT AMERICAN ORTHOPEDIC TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LISA B. SCHER

LISA B SCHER WEINSTEIN SCHER & KIMMELMANONE INDEPENDENCE SQ W601 WALNUT ST STE L-44PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010medical soft goods, namely back supports, sacrolumbar corsets, knee braces, knee caps, anklets and knee immobilers, cervical collars, cervical traction devices, pelvic traction devices and parts therefor, slings, wristlets and arm immobilizers, thigh and shin supports, elastic binders and rib belts; electrical and electronic physical therapy devices, namely short wave diathermy apparatus, ultra sound apparatus, low and high voltage muscle stimulators and tens units; rehabilitation equipment, namely free weights and universal resistance training apparatus; mechanical and diagnostic equipment, namely neurological hammers, stethoscopes, paraspinal EMG's, and diagnostic ultrasound apparatus; and medical treatment and examining tables and chairs such as ENT chairs, OB-GYN tables with stirrups, and chiropractic manipulation tablesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 2, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 10, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 25, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 16, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance