USPTO serial 74622689
JEWELRY MANUFACTURER'S OUTLET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANOK, DAWNMARIE DISTEFANO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JEWELRY MANUFACTURER'S OUTLET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip J. Zadeik
PHILIP J ZADEIK BAKER & MCKENZIE130 E RANDOLPH DR2800 ONE PRUDENTIAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | retail and wholesale store services featuring jewelry and precious metals, watches and clocks, fragrances, writing instruments, sunglasses, collectibles and related luxury gift items | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 1997 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1996 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |