USPTO serial 74622781
RED BULL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RED BULL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mercer L. Stockell
MERCER L STOCKELL PENNIE & EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-2711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | tequila | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 6, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |