Drawing for BOURBON CHICKEN

USPTO serial 74622815

BOURBON CHICKEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOURBON CHICKEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES E. BAXLEY

CHARLES E BAXLEY HART, BAXLEY, DANIELS & HOLTON59 JOHN ST 4TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10038UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022food item, namely a poultry dish for consumption on or off the premisesACTIVEDec 9, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 28, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 28, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 19, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 18, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 5, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 28, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 31, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance