USPTO serial 74622933
RESPIVENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RESPIVENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Suffolk IP1 1QH, GB
Suffolk IP1 1QH, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet Dore
JANET DORE MORGAN & FINNEGAN345 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical inhalation devices for the delivery of medications to the lungs, and parts and fittings therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1998 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |