USPTO serial 74623016
WHITE LIGHTNING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 12, 1997
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WHITE LIGHTNING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PETER A. HOLMES SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
Virginia Beach, VA
Other trademarks owned by PETER A. HOLMES SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
PETER A. HOLMES SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
Virginia Beach, VA
Other trademarks owned by PETER A. HOLMES SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
PETER A. HOLMES SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
Virginia Beach, VA
Other trademarks owned by PETER A. HOLMES SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRADLEY D. GOLDIZEN
BRADLEY D GOLDIZEN BRAD GOLDIZEN, PC505 S INDEPENDENCE BLVD STE 102VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23452UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, satin jackets and ball caps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PETER A. HOLMES SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PETER A. HOLMES SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PETER A. HOLMES SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named WHITE LIGHTNING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 20, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |