USPTO serial 74623471
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richards & O'Neil
RICHARDS & O'NEAL885 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-4873UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications machinery and equipment, namely, modems, computer interface boards, chips and peripherals, audio cassettes and tapes containing music, literature and educational material for the study of language, geography, mathematics, natural science, history, economy, finance, law, politics and engineering, metronomes, motion picture film, exposed photographic slide transparencies and mounts for same, electric wires and cables, and recorded video disks and videotapes containing music, movies, drama, fine arts, cartoons, travel guides, sports and educational materials for the study of language, geoegraphy, mathematics, natural science, history, economy, finance, law, politics and engineering | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | computer hardware and comptuer game programs for use with video arcade and TV games | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |