USPTO serial 74624076
COASTCLUB VACATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COASTCLUB VACATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Liss
MARK J LISS LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Camp Coast to Coast, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Camp Coast to Coast, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COASTCLUB VACATIONS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |