USPTO serial 74624791
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
D-40217 Dusseldorf, DE
D-40217 Dusseldorf, DE
D-40217 Dusseldorf, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marlene J. Williams
Marlene J. Williams Nixon Peabody LLPP.O. Box 26769San Francisco, CA 94126UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal signboards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 29, 1999 |
| 009 | technical apparatus and devices for operating parking areas, namely, electric apparatus and machines for dispensing parking cards, electric and electronic apparatus for reading parking cards, microprocessor based remote control electronic gates for entrance and access control; cards with integrated chip used as parking cards; and charging devices therefore, namely, cash registers, computer hardware and software for operating electronic cash registers; electric and electronic apparatus for counting cars entering and leaving a parking lot | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 29, 1999 |
| 011 | apparatus for lighting, namely, electric lighting fixtures, electric lamps and signals lamps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 29, 1999 |
| 019 | [parking barriers, namely, metal traffic barricades] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 29, 1999 |
| 020 | [plastic signboards] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 29, 1999 |
| 037 | operating of parking areas including multi story parking garages; installation and maintenance of technical devices and apparatus for operating parking areas, in particular devices for entrance and access control | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 29, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 1, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 16, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 2, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |