USPTO serial 74624903
LANCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LANCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FIN-00510, Helsinki, FI
FIN-00510, Helsinki, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas C. Pontani
THOMAS C PONTANI COHEN, PONTANI, LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | local area network equipment, namely, computer hardware, computer peripherals and computer software for monitoring, controlling, managing and taking care of telecommunication networks and local area networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | network hardware and wiring installation, upkeep and repair services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, telephone services, facsimile services, telegraphic services, and data transmission services; management and maintenance of telecommunications networks and local area networks, namely, local and remote operation and control of networks and of network hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | management and maintenance services relating to the hardware, software and wiring of telecommunications networks and local area networks, namely continuous and dynamic monitoring of network and network hardware and software operation, network hardware, software and wiring fault detection services, network software upgrade and updating services, preparation and updating of network documentation and network configuration and operating reports, planning of telecommunications networks and local area networks, and analysis of network operation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELECOM FINLAND OY
- Other trademarks owned by TELECOM FINLAND OY
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LANCARE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 27, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 1996 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |