USPTO serial 74624904
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
D-85579 Neubiberg, DE
D-85579 Neubiberg, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Friedrich Kueffner
342 MADISON AVESTE 1921NEW YORK, NY 10173| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers and computer programs for telecommunication purposes, industrial purposes and/or control purposes, namely in the form of read only memories, disks and tapes, computer programs for computers and computer programs in the form of read only memories, disks and tapes, namely computer programs for acquisition or detection equipment, computer programs for input or output equipment, computer programs for storage and conversion equipment, computer programs for the transfer and/or transmission of data, computer programs for process control computers | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 20, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |