USPTO serial 74624969
HORNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HORNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas W. Kenyon
DOUGLAS W KENYON HUNTON & WILLIAMSPOST OFFICE BOX 109RALEIGH, NC 27602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer systems, comprising integrated hardware and software, design for the purpose of functioning as integrated administrative and clinical information networks in the health care field | ABANDONED | Feb 28, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 1, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 21, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 28, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 18, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |