Drawing for TRUE FRIENDS

USPTO serial 74625246

TRUE FRIENDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUE FRIENDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Pickerill

John C. Pickerill Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.200 South Sixth StreetSuite 4000Minneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009educational products for consumers and for the educational market, namely interactive CD ROM and computer software in the fields of traditional academic, problem-solving, social interaction and communication areas, software for coloring book emulation for use by children with disabilities, and software to present educational curriculum in the fields of traditional academic, problem-solving, social interaction, and communications areasABANDONED—
016educational products for consumers and for the educational market, namely books, workbooks, and books with pre-recorded audio tapes sold as a unit, in the fields of traditional academic, problem-solving, social interaction and communication areas for use by children with disabilitiesABANDONED—
028games, namely board games and computer game software for use by children with disabilitiesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 1997DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 29, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 31, 1997DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 28, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 4, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 21, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance