USPTO serial 74625412
HYUNDAI TECHLEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAVONESE, DANIEL P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYUNDAI TECHLEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda Laura Nye
AMANDA LAURA NYE DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | unprocessed artificial resins, unprocessed epoxy resins, unprocessed acrylic resins, unprocessed synthetic resins, and manures, for use in the petrochemical industry; and unprocessed plastics in resin or powder form for use in further manufacture of goods | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | acrylonitrile butadiene rubber latex, styrene butadiene rubber, styrene butadiene rubber latex, polybutadiene rubber, isoprene rubber, ethylene propylene rubber, isobutylene isoprene rubber, acrylonitrile butadiene rubber, chloroprene rubber, acrylic rubber, epichlorydrin rubber, and vinylpyridine latex, for use in the petrochemical industry | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hyundai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Hyundai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named HYUNDAI TECHLEN
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |