Drawing for GOLF VALUE CARD

USPTO serial 74634385

GOLF VALUE CARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLF VALUE CARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Byard G. Nilsson

BYARD G NILSSON NILSSON, WURST & GREEN707 WILSHIRE BLVD 32ND FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009identification cards bearing machine readable data for use in - identifying members of a golf organization, and providing, arranging and coordinating access to and security of the physical premises of a golf organization, and recording storing and maintenance of golf participation records, namely attendance, and records of activities, and golf handicap scoresABANDONED—
035business information services, namely providing marketing information obtained from identification cards bearing machine readable data used in identifying members of a golf organization, and providing, arranging and coordinating access to and security of the physical premises of a golf organization, and recording storing and maintenance of golf participation records, namely attendance, and records of activities, and golf handicap scoresABANDONED—
042monitoring security systems at physical premises of golf organization by means of identification cards bearing machine readable dataABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 1998EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 1998EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 1, 1998EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 18, 1997EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 1997EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 3, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 20, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 28, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 14, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 11, 1996ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 9, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 4, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance