USPTO serial 74634642
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William R. Hinds
JOHN W CHESTNUT TILTON FALLON LUNGMUS & CHESTNUT100 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-4002UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | metal working fluids for use as a coolant-lubricant in metal grinding and/or cutting and/or other metal working operations | ACTIVE | May 8, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 5, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 9, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 9, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |