Drawing for BALLISTIC NYLON

USPTO serial 74671277

BALLISTIC NYLON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUSSMAN, RONALD
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BALLISTIC NYLON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeff L. Kaplan

JEFF L KAPLANP O BOX 11106FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018textile fabric sold as a component part of tote bags, garment bags for travel and luggageACTIVEMar 3, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 20, 1998EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 17, 1997CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 21, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 3, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 5, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance