USPTO serial 74671539
PYRAMID IMAGING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PYRAMID IMAGING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL RAYNOR KEATING
PAUL RAYNOR KEATING CARROLL, BURDICK & MCDONOUGH, LLP44 MONTGOMERY ST STE 400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | assessment, configuration, namely, design of computer networks and layouts and configuration, namely software configuration principally hardware and software dealing with computer output to laser disk and computer image based data storage, and consulting services rendered in connection therewith | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |