Drawing for CLEAR IMAGE

USPTO serial 74675928

CLEAR IMAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEAR IMAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marnie Wright Barnhorst

MARNIE WRIGHT BARNHORST GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH401 B ST STE 1700SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040applying protective coatings to optical lenses of eyeglasses and sunglassesABANDONEDMay 5, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 1998ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 11, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 11, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 5, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 5, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 8, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 8, 1997EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 2, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 24, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 19, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 1995IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Dec 8, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 24, 1995AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 25, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 1995IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance