USPTO serial 74676241
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN L FAIGUS
MARTIN L FAIGUS ESQ CAESAR RIVISE BERNSTEIN COHEN ET AL7 PENN CTR 12TH FL1632 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | kitchen cutlery, namely, non-electric can openers, pizza cutters, hand-operated choppers, chef's knives, paring knives, butcher knives, non-electric fruit and vegetable peelers, kitchen scissors, pizza slicers, cheese slicers and hand-operated slicers | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 1997 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1997 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |