Drawing for MAKING YOUR VOICE HEARD

USPTO serial 74676779

MAKING YOUR VOICE HEARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAKING YOUR VOICE HEARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARTIN R GREENSTEIN

MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARKMARKET POST TOWET55 S MARKET ST 16TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs for use in electronic voice mail and voice messaging, electronic mail, automated attendant, interactive voice response, namely, recording, storage and subsequent retransmission of voice and data messages based on user input, call processing, word processing, fax processing, namely, electronic transmission of messages and data, computer information storage and retrieval, database processing, accessing computer databases, networking, and programming tools and utilitiesABANDONED—
038electronic voice mail and voice messaging services and interactive voice response services, namely, recording, storage and subsequent retransmission of voice and data messages by telephone or computer network based on user input; electroncic mail services; fax processing services, namely, electronic transmission of messages and data; electronic automated attendant servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 1998ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 29, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 17, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance