USPTO serial 74677032
MANTA RAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MANTA RAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Downsview, Ontrario M3J 3G1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VINCENZA NICOLA EMERSON
24 SHARPCROFT BLVDDOWNSVIEW, ON M3J 3G1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | hand and bathroom utensils for cleaning purposes, namely brushes, mops and sponges | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |