USPTO serial 74677093
ROLLERBALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROLLERBALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay H. Geller
JAY H GELLERE TWR STE 6002425 W OLYMPIC BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | action figures and accessories therefor, mechanical action toys, stuffed toy dolls and animals, storage bags for skates, knee pads for athletic use, wrist pads for athletic use, ankle pads for athletic use, ball games, bath toys, toy blocks, board games, card games, Christmas tree ornaments, action figure clothing, computer game cartidges, computer game cassettes, computer game equipment containing memory devices, namely, discs, computer game programs, dolls, easter egg coloring kits, electric action toys, hand-held units for playing electronic games, party favors in the nature of small toys and noisemakers, video game machines, action skill games, hockey goalie pads, gloves for use in roller skating, in-line skating and hockey engaging in sporting activities, hockey sticks, jigsaw puzzles, kites, costume masks, and yo-yos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |