USPTO serial 74677197
CABLE-TY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CABLE-TY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL L. HOELTER
MICHAEL L HOELTER THOMAS & BETTS CORPORATION8155 T & B BLVDMEMPHIS, TN 38125UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | hardware, namely straps for securing communication cables | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 12, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |