Drawing for NAKED MUSIC NYC

USPTO serial 74677351

NAKED MUSIC NYC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, MARGARET
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAKED MUSIC NYC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald S. Bienstock

RONALD S BIENSTOCK HORING WELIKSON & BIENSTOCK, PC250 W 57TH ST STE 1917NEW YORK, NY 10107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042any and all forms of printed or published music and any and al forms of pre-recorded music products, namely CD's, cassettes, vinyl records and videotapesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 1997PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED—
Oct 1, 1996PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 22, 1996ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance