USPTO serial 74677492
LOMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oliver R. Chernin
OLIVER R CHERNIN STEINBERG, RASKIN & DAVIDSON, PC1140 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | homeopathic pharmaceuticals for use in the treatment of acne, asthma, sinus and nasal allergies, arthritis, psoriasis, seborrheic dermatitis and dandruff, eczema and atopic dermatitis, and loss of energy | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 30, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |