USPTO serial 74677635
LOAD LAMA THE ULTIMATE BIKE RACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOAD LAMA THE ULTIMATE BIKE RACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul M. Craig, Jr.
PAUL M CRAIG JR207 QUAINT ACRES DRSILVER SPRING, MD 20904UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | carrying racks for mounting on bicycles; accessories for bicycle racks, namely attachments for expanding the carrying capacity of a carrying rack for mounting on bicycles; and bungee cords sold together as a unit with such carrying racks | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 4, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 9, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |