USPTO serial 74678186
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sioux Falls, SD
Sioux Falls, SD
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ivar M. Kaardal
IVAR M KAARDAL805 N ELMWOOD AVESIOUX FALLS, SD 57104-1942UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers and computer peripherals | ABANDONED | May 1, 1987 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |