Drawing for DVL DIGITAL VISION LABORATORIES

USPTO serial 74678381

DVL DIGITAL VISION LABORATORIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, MARGARET
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DVL DIGITAL VISION LABORATORIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK S SOMMERS

MARK S SOMMERS FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs for use in processing, managing, controlling, accessing and executing other computer programs; computer programs for use in navigating, browsing, transferring information, and distributing and viewing other computer programsACTIVE—
016books and magazines on electronic and electric technologies and productsACTIVE—
028computer game machines for cartridges, disk drives, network interfaces, computer game software, cartridges and disksACTIVE—
035copyright and patent management servicesACTIVE—
041educational services, namely, conducting seminars in the field of electronic technologiesACTIVE—
042scientific research in the field of electronic technologiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 11, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 11, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2000EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2000EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 26, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 12, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 1999REINREINSTATED—
Feb 5, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 1, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 20, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 5, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 13, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 6, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 25, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance