USPTO serial 74678539
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Jacksonville, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. J. Heher
R J HEHER LILLICK & CHARLESTWO EMBARCADERO CTR STE 2600SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | banking services; financing services; financial information provided by mail, voice mail, courier, satellite adn electronic means; financial management; financial analysis and consultation; financial forecasting; financial investment in the fields of insurance, securities, art and collectibles and precious metals services; financial planning; financial portfolio management; financial research; financial valuation of personal property and real estate; credit card services; credit card verification; insurance underwriting services, namely credit life, cred disability, fire, travel related insurance, hotel theft insurance, CDW insurance in car rental agreements, mortgage insurance, coverage for the deductible amounts in other insurance policies; insurance administration; insurance brokerage; insurance claims administration; electronic processing of insurance claims and payment data; processing of insurance claims and payment data; insurance consultation; art brokerage; debit card services; limited partnerships (formation offering and management of); secured credit card services; pre-paid telephone expense calling card services; brokerage services in the fields of art, insurance, automobiles, consumer products, clothing and travel services | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |