USPTO serial 74679229
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Halamka
JOHN E HALAMKA21515 HAWTHORNE BLVD STE 590TORRACE, CA 90503UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | automobile parts for imported land vehicle engines, namely, bearings, guides, pistons, valves, gaskets, rings, camshafts, oil pumps, and timing components | ABANDONED | Aug 26, 1972 |
| 009 | automobile parts for imported land vehicles for heating/cooling and electrical, namely, batteries, thermostats, water pumps, radiators, fan clutches, hoses, and belts | ABANDONED | Aug 26, 1972 |
| 011 | automobile parts for imported land vehicles for air conditioners, namely, compressors, evaporators, dryers, and condensers | ABANDONED | Aug 26, 1972 |
| 012 | automobile parts for imported land vehicles for brakes, namely, actuators, pads, shoes, disc rotors, drums, master cylinders and other hydraulics; and, driveline elements, namely, transmissions, seals, gears, drive shafts, universal joints, axle boots, axle shafts, seals, wheel bearings, and, clutch components; and, directional signals, namely, bulbs and lenses | ABANDONED | Aug 26, 1972 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |