USPTO serial 74679709
WEBTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOLFSON, FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEBTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
REDMOND, WA
Mountain View, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY H MOORE
GARY H MOORE MCCUTCHEN DOYLE BROWN & ENERSEN3 EMBARCADERO CTRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and peripherals, namely, expansion port circuit board cards, ISDN access circuit board cards, disk drive circuit board cards, printer circuit board cards, and cable/TV modem circuit board cards; computer software programs for video editing; computer operating system software for real-time video games | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telephone communication services in the form of audio and video teleconferencing | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services in the nature of correspondence classes provided on-line; production of audio and video programming; publication of books and magazines and consultation related thereto; computer services, namely, providing on-line video games and gambling games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MICROSOFT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Perlman, Stephen G.
- Other trademarks owned by WEBTV NETWORKS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WEBTV NETWORKS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WEBTV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |