Drawing for ROWDY

USPTO serial 74679842

ROWDY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROWDY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely, mascara, lipstick and lip gloss, skin cleansing creams, skin cleansing lotions, skin creams, skin emulsions, hair lotions; fragrances, namely, perfumes, toilet water, colognes; sun tanning preparations; and skin care products, namely, moisturizer, body powder, face powder, bath powder, shampoo and deodorantACTIVE—
016books, namely, game book manuals specifying rules and instructions for playing a role playing game, appointment books, autograph books, children's books, coloring books, composition books, guest books, notebooks, picture books, song books and travel booksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 1999EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 11, 1999EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 3, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 7, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 1, 1998EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 11, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 31, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 8, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 3, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 13, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 4, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance